What was your primary reason for selecting this program?

For the following questions, please answer using a scale of 1 to 5.

(1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree)

Program Evaluation
Objective 1 was met: Explain how descriptive and explanatory models of violent behavior can be extended into practical, prevention focused approaches for use in clinical, educational, and community settings.
Objective 2 was met: Describe how risk for serious harm develops over time through the interaction of individual, social, and environmental factors, rather than being determined by diagnosis, identity, or personality alone.
Objective 3 was met: Recognize behavior-based warning signs that may indicate increased vulnerability or need for support, while avoiding assumptions that stigmatize neurodivergent individuals or those with mental health challenges.
Objective 4 was met: Apply developmentally informed, tiered prevention strategies (universal, targeted, and intensive) to realworld scenarios involving youth and young adults.
Objective 5 was met: Use ethical decision-making principles to balance safety, autonomy, dignity, and inclusion when responding to concerning behaviors or situations.
Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training.
Instruction was at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training.

For the following questions, please answer using a scale of 1 to 5.

(1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree)

The Instructor(s)...
Knew the subject matter
Elaborated upon the stated objectives
Provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations)
Maintained my interest
Presented content effectively e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning, included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies
Answered questions effectively

For the following questions, please answer using Yes or No

Professional & Ethical issues.
Prior to completion of the CE, were the following made clear?
The requirements for successful completion of the activity i.e., attending in the program’s entirety and completing an evaluation form were made clear.
The accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught, and the severe and most common risks were disclosed.
Commercial support for the instructor, sponsor, content of the workshop, or benefit of endorsement for products, such as any relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest, was provided on the flyer advertising the workshop.

For the following questions, please answer using a scale of 1 to 5.

(1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree)

Venue & Setting
Facility was adequate for my needs
Special needs were met (e.g., disability or other accommodations as requested)
Program flyer distributed via email was informative and accurate

For the following questions, please answer using a scale of 1 to 5.

(1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree)

Learning
Information could be applied to my practice or other work context
Information could contribute to achieving personal or professional goals
Cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender differences were considered
Learning was enhanced through a variety of media utilizing auditory, visual, and multimedia formats
The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information

For the following questions, please answer using a scale of 1 to 5.

(1 = zero, 2 = very little, 3 = some, 4 = a good amount, 5 = a great deal)

How much do you learn as a result of this CE program?
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?

For the following question, please answer using Yes or No

Learning
Would you recommend this program to others?