2021 Northwest Psychological Fall Convention

2021 Northwest Psychological Fall Convention – The Trust Ethics Evaluation


For the following questions, please answer using a scale of 1 to 5.

(1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree)

1. The workshop description was accurate.
3. The teaching format/length was suitable to the content.
5. The concepts were well-explained.
7. The staff was responsive and helpful.
9. Enrollment was smooth and efficient.
11. I can describe three general challenges to unbiased decision-making.
13. I can list four strategies to address decision-making bias and improve ethical and risk management choices.
15. I can differentiate general areas in which professional advocacy is and is not appropriate.
17. I can evaluate three methods of engaging in self-care to support better practice and risk-management.
2. I acquired new knowledge and/or skills.
4. The presenter was well-prepared.
6. The presenter was responsive to questions.
8. The participant/instructor interaction was sufficient.
10. Handouts and audiovisual aids were legible and helpful.
12. I can identify three vulnerabilities that can affect clinician decision-making, in particular.
14. I can summarize three risk-related aspects to remote service provision.
16. I can identify two issues when psychotherapy patients make quasi-forensic requests.
18. I would recommend this workshop to others.

For the following questions, please answer using a scale of 1 to 5.

(1 = zero, 2 = very little, 3 = some, 4 = a good amount, 5 = a great deal)

19. How much do you learn as a result of this CE program?
20. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?
Thank you for submitting your CE Evaluation. It has been received.
There was an error in submitting your CE Evaluation. Please try again later.